Accuracy assessment in determining the location of corners of building structures using a combination of various measurement methods
When surveys of corners of building structures are carried out, surveyors frequently use a compilation of two surveying methods. The first one involves the determination of several corners with reference to a geodetic control using classical methods of surveying field details. The second method relates to the remaining corner points of a structure, which are determined in sequence from distance-distance intersection, using control linear values of the wall faces of the building, the so-called tie distances. This paper assesses the accuracy of coordinates of corner points of a building structure, determined using the method of distance-distance intersection, based on the corners which had previously been determined by the conducted surveys tied to a geodetic control. It should be noted, however, that such a method of surveying the corners of building structures from linear measures is based on the details of the first-order accuracy, while the regulations explicitly allow such measurement only for the details of the second- and third-order accuracy. Therefore, a question arises whether this legal provision is unfounded, or whether surveyors are acting not only against the applicable standards but also without due diligence while performing surveys? This study provides answers to the formulated problem. The main purpose of the study was to verify whether the actual method which is used in practice for surveying building structures allows to obtain the required accuracy of coordinates of the points being determined, or whether it should be strictly forbidden. The results of the conducted studies clearly demonstrate that the problem is definitely more complex. Eventually, however, it might be assumed that assessment of the accuracy in determining a location of corners of a building using a combination of two different surveying methods will meet the requirements of the regulation [MIA, 2011), subject to compliance with relevant baseline criteria, which have been presented in this study. Observance of the proposed boundary conditions would allow for frequent performance of surveys of building structures by surveyors (from tie distances), while maintaining the applicable accuracy criteria. This would allow for the inclusion of surveying documentation into the national geodetic and cartographic documentation center database pursuant to the legal bases.
Andrianova, S. D. (2008). High-accuracy geodetic monitoring during construction and occupancy of modern buildings. Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering 2008. Volume 45, Issue 2, pp. 66-70. Doi:10.1007/s11204-008-9000-5
Buśko M. (2016). Analysis of the influence of changes in the laws of buildings in the aspect of updating the real etate cadastral database. Infrastructure and Ecology of Rural Areas. No. 2016/II/1 (Apr 2016)). pp. 395-410.
Buśko M. (2016). Building contour line in the database of the real estate cadastre in Poland pursuant to applicable laws. EconTechMod (Lublin): an international quarterly journal on economics in technology, new technologies and modeling processes. ISSN 2084-5715. - 2016 vol. 5 no. 3, pp. 183-190.
MIA. (2011). Regulation of the Minister of Internal Affairs and Administration of 9 November 2011 on the technical standards for the performance of geodetic topographic and detailed surveys as well as the preparation and transfer of these surveys to the National Cartographic Documentation Center database (in Polish). Journal of Laws 263 (item 1572), Warsaw: Government Legislation Center.
Ostwald M., Vaughan J. (2016). Measuring Architecture. The Fractal Dimension of Architecture. Book Section 2016. Springer International Publishing. Volume 1 of the series Mathematics and the Built Environment pp. 67-85. Doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-32426-5_4
Przewięźlikowska A., Krzyżek R. (2016). As-built survey of buildings in the context of compliance of the location of the building with the site development plan for the plot). Geodesic Review. ISSN 0033-2127. 2016. 88 No. 8, pp. 11-15.
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright © Reports on Geodesy and Geoinformatics 2014-2017, e-mail: email@example.com